Skip to content

How to Handle Resistance to Accounting Technology

Updated Checked by the Tax-Services.ca editorial team How we check

Resistance to accounting technology usually isn’t about the software. It’s about a person who has been right for fifteen years and is now asked to trust a screen. The fix that works best is boring: let them check the new system against numbers they already trust, and let them find the first mistake themselves.

Why do people dig in?

Usually for reasons that have some sense in them. Staff worry that they’ll be blamed for errors the system makes. They worry about client files going somewhere they can’t see. And some worry about their jobs, which is the one nobody says out loud.

You can’t argue the last one away. You can only be honest about what the new tool will and won’t do.

The first two, though, have answers. Who’s accountable, and where is the data? Get those written down before the training session, not after.

What rules still apply after you switch?

The CRA doesn’t care which software you use. It cares that the records are there and usable. Its electronic records page says you keep them in a readable format for six years after the end of the year they relate to, that backups have to restore into a format the CRA can use, and that you stay responsible when a provider holds the records for you.

That’s a useful thing to say to a nervous team, because it turns a vague fear into a short checklist. Where do the files live? Who can restore them? Has anyone tried? The wording is in the CRA’s circular on electronic record keeping, which is short enough to read together over lunch.

Worry A fact you can point to
“What if the vendor disappears?” The CRA says you remain responsible for records held by a provider, so you need an exit plan
“What if we can’t open old files?” Six year retention in a readable format, and backups you can restore
“Is client data safe with this tool?” Canadian privacy regulators’ nine principles for generative AI, December 2023, list safeguards and accountability, which apply as a checklist to any tool that touches personal information
“Will it get the maths wrong?” Test it, using the parallel run below

How does a parallel run calm people down?

Pick one pay cycle and one employee. Work out what should happen using a reference outside the new system, then compare.

Here’s one from our own tools. An employee paid $3,000 every two weeks in Ontario has $732.62 held back in total: $521.48 of income tax, $167.94 of CPP and $43.20 of EI. The employer adds $228.41 (CPP $167.94 and EI $60.47), so $961.03 goes to the CRA each pay period. Those are the payroll remittance calculator results with 2026 data.

Now put the same person through the new system. If it matches to within a few dollars, the sceptic has just watched the tool pass a test. If it doesn’t, you’ve found a setup problem at no cost to a real pay run.

A few dollars of difference is normal. Payroll tools calculate in steps through the year, and our payroll deductions calculator says as much. Bigger gaps are worth a phone call to the vendor.

How do you keep the person in the room?

Give the loudest doubter the test. Not a training slot, the test. Ask them to come up with three cases that would break the new system, then run them. People defend a system they helped check.

Keep sessions short and tied to real files. A two hour tour of menus is forgotten by lunch. One client file done start to finish, on the new system, sticks.

Name the old tasks that are going away. If data entry drops, say what the time goes to. A vague answer like “higher value work” gets eye rolls, and it should. Pick something concrete, such as reviewing the take-home pay figures for clients who ask why their paycheque looks smaller.

What does this look like in a real office?

Picture Gloria, a bookkeeper of twenty years at a small accounting practice in Sudbury. She’s sure the new payroll module will mangle overtime. Her manager doesn’t give a speech. She hands Gloria the pretend employee above and says, build me three cases you think will break it. Gloria builds four. Two pass, one exposes a setting nobody had changed, and one turns out to be a real gap that the vendor has to explain. Two weeks later Gloria is the one showing others how to run the checks. She didn’t change her mind because she was told to. She changed it because she found the problem herself.

Mistakes that make resistance worse

Announcing the switch date before anyone has used the tool is the classic one. Close behind is skipping the old system too early. Keep it available read only until a full year end has gone through the new one, and never discard records before six years are up.

Another is treating every objection as fear of change. Sometimes the objection is right. If an experienced bookkeeper says a report misses GST/HST on a mixed supply, check it against the GST/HST calculator before you decide it’s resistance.

Finally, don’t promise savings you can’t show. We looked for an official figure on time saved by accounting software and found none, so we have none to offer.

Where the numbers come from

Record retention and backup rules come from the Canada Revenue Agency page on electronic records. The nine principles come from the Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada, published 7 December 2023. The payroll figures come from our calculator, which uses 2026 rates. Gloria is an invented example, and the advice on handling people is our judgement, not an official rule.

Frequently asked questions

Why do accountants resist new software?

Often it's fear of blame for errors, worry about where client data goes, or job worries. The first two can be answered with facts.

Does the CRA care which software I use?

It cares that records are kept, readable and restorable for six years after the year they relate to, not which product you use.

How can I test new payroll software?

Run one employee through it and compare the amounts to remit with a reference calculator. A few dollars of difference is normal.

Should I switch off the old system right away?

No. Keep it read only through a full year end, and don't discard records before six years.

Is there proof the new tool saves time?

We found no official figure, so measure it yourself on a real client file.

More on this topic

Previous Article

What Does Accounting Digital Transformation Cost?

Next Article

How Will AI Affect Accounting in Canada?

Share this page